Dedre Gentner - A Comparison of ARCS and MAC / FAC

Journal article

D. Gentner
2002

Semantic Scholar

Cite

APA Click to copy
Gentner, D. (2002). A Comparison of ARCS and MAC / FAC.

Chicago/Turabian Click to copy
Gentner, D. “A Comparison of ARCS and MAC / FAC” (2002).

MLA Click to copy
Gentner, D. A Comparison of ARCS and MAC / FAC. 2002.

BibTeX Click to copy

@article{d2002a,
  title = {A Comparison of ARCS and MAC / FAC},
  year = {2002},
  author = {Gentner, D.}
}

Abstract

cumnt lilcorh and supporting simulations of similaritybased retrieval disagree in their pDcess model of m a n t i c similarity decisions. We compare two current cornputatid simulations d similarity-ked retrieval, h4AC/FAC and ARCS, with particular attention to the semantic similarity modcls used in each. Fwr experiments are presented cunpciring the pcrfmmance d these simulations on a carunon set of representations. The results suggest that MAC/FAC, with its identicality-based constraint on semantic similarity. provides a better account of retrieval than ARCS, with its similarity-table based model