Dedre Gentner

Alice Gabrielle Twight Professor of Psychology & Education

Structural Evaluation of Analogies : What Counts?


Journal article


Kenneth D. Forbus, D. Gentner
1989

Semantic Scholar
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Forbus, K. D., & Gentner, D. (1989). Structural Evaluation of Analogies : What Counts?


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Forbus, Kenneth D., and D. Gentner. “Structural Evaluation of Analogies : What Counts?” (1989).


MLA   Click to copy
Forbus, Kenneth D., and D. Gentner. Structural Evaluation of Analogies : What Counts? 1989.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{kenneth1989a,
  title = {Structural Evaluation of Analogies : What Counts?},
  year = {1989},
  author = {Forbus, Kenneth D. and Gentner, D.}
}

Abstract

Judgments of similarity and soundness are important aspects of human analogical processing. This paper explores how these judgments can be modeled using SME, a simulation of Gentner's structure-mapping theory. We focus on structural evaluation, explicating several principles which psychologically plausible algorithms should follow. We introduce the Speci city Conjecture, which claims that naturalistic representations include a preponderance of appearance and low-order information. We demonstrate via computational experiments that this conjecture a ects how structural evaluation should be performed, including the choice of normalization technique and how the systematicity preference is implemented.